SECTIONS
ABOUT US  
MEMBER BENEFITS  
EDUCATION  
ADVOCACY  
LEGISLATIVE NEWS  
 
RESOURCES
FORMS  
SOURCEBOOK  
GENERAL STORE  
EXACTCHECK  
CALENDAR  
 
SAC. REPORT ARCHIVE
VIEW ARCHIVE  
 


AACSC
333 W. BROADWAY ST.
SUITE 101
LONG BEACH, CA 90802
562.426.8341

 

Sacramento Report
By Ron Kingston

Did you ever wonder how a simple concept could become so complicated that you just walk away from the endeavor?

As introduced, AB 1975 (Fong) proposed to require residential landlords to install a separate water meter on existing and new buildings when a new water service was provided to the property.

The only two apartment associations to take exception to this requirement were the Apartment Association of Orange County and ours. Landlords who own existing buildings that have master water meters would have been forced to re-plumb entire buildings upon sale, transfer, or change in tenancy.

Luckily, the author and sponsors, the Sierra Club, understood our argument and agreed to amend the bill with our language. Simply put, only new residential and commercial structures for which the first occupancy permit for a newly constructed building would be required to have individual meters or submeters as a condition of new water service to that property.

Does that sound OK to you? Well, if that is where the bill ended many of us would have been happy. That is not the case however. Over 15 interest groups began to get involved and as a consequence, the bill is becoming more complicated.

Take for example East Bay Municipal Utility District (East Bay MUD). You would think that the district named addresses issues pertaining only to the operation, installation, and billing of water in their jurisdictional boundaries. That could not be further from the truth.

They want to “strengthen” the bill by:

  1. requiring billing standards for tenants even though they will not bill the tenant
  2. create a state law that establishes a “Tenant’s Bills of Rights”
  3. precisely spell out how and when we are to bill tenants
  4. ban billing service fees
  5. require landlords to maintain a toll-free number for customer service and hours and days of service!

Now if the demands from East Bay MUD were not enough, let’s look at a small sample of the requirements from the principal tenants organizations. Tenants’ rights groups are insisting the legislation include:

  1. prohibition of a cost pass through for billing the tenant for use of water
  2. provide for a dispute resolution process
  3. require landlords to disclose the laws concerning tenants rights to dispute water fees
  4. how tenants could inspect the devices
  5. only meters could be used and NO submeters would be permitted which will add up to $20,000 per unit in construction costs and increase the cost per unit of water
  6. give rent control boards jurisdiction in water fee issues
  7. provide for penalties if a landlord overcharges for water usage
  8. require water districts to install and maintain the meters
  9. provide an extended grace period to pay water bills

Do you think the legislature will have time to address literally dozens of complex and highly-charged issues within the ensuing months? Only time will tell.

On another water bill, SB 1035 Senator Hancock had proposed to change existing state law as it pertains to East Bay Municipal Utility District water and sewer billing practices.

Existing law prohibits municipal utility districts from placing a lien on a property due to a tenant’s failure to pay that bill. Further a district cannot condition a new service connection for a subsequent tenant until the unpaid water bill of a former tenant is paid.

Prior to the first hearing we informed the author’s office that we would oppose the legislation should the district seek to strike the landlord protections from existing law. The only plea by the district representatives was they were losing $2 million a year due to a tenant’s failure to pay water bills. Our response: too bad!

Ultimately, the bill was amended to our satisfaction. You may wonder why we got involved in a bill that does not directly affect our members? If East Bay MUD had been successful, other water suppliers would have sponsored legislation that would have given them a legal right to lien our properties should a tenant fail to pay a water bill.

 

Ron may be reached at: Ron@CALPCG.com
or you can call him at (916) 447-7229.

 

Latest Association News
* SACRAMENTO SCENE
* PRESIDENTS MESSAGE
* LATEST BILL ACTIVITY
* POLITICAL PERSPECTIVES
* ASSOCIATION CALENDAR
* WASHINGTON UPDATE
 

Membership Information
Phone: (562) 426-8341

Membership Application.pdf

Aplicacion Para Membrecia.pdf

Quick Resource Links

INTERACTIVE FORMS
ONLINE CREDIT CHECKS
GENERAL STORE
ONLINE SOURCEBOOK
BECOME A MEMBER

AACSC Privacy Policy

web site designed & maintained by swiftmedia.net

AACSC, 333 W. Broadway St., Suite 101, Long Beach, CA 90802 / 562.426.8341
© Copyright 2008 Apartment Association, California Southern Cities, Inc