|
This Month: NMHC WASHINGTON
UPDATE
COMMERCIAL
REAL ESTATE LENDING GUIDANCE FINALIZED
On December 6, federal
regulators published a new rule for lenders
with concentrations of commercial real estate
(CRE) loans, including multifamily mortgages.
A draft rule was issued in January 2006 in response
to growing concerns that banks were easing underwriting
standards for CRE loans to a degree that could
trigger future problems in the banking system.
NMHC/NAA’s analysis
of the final rule, which is largely improved
from the draft, suggests that it should not
restrict credit access for apartment firms.
Importantly, the rule does not set "hard
limits" on CRE lending and does not change
bank reserve requirements. Instead, it establishes
triggers based on portfolio size and CRE loan
growth to identify banks that require additional
regulator scrutiny. Extra oversight would be
triggered whenever an institution's total land,
construction and development loans equal 100
percent or more of its total capital or if these
loans plus loans secured by multifamily or commercial
properties equal 300 percent or more of total
capital and the CRE portfolio has grown by more
than 50 percent over a 36-month period.
Despite the improvements
made in the final rule, Representative Barney
Frank (D-MA), incoming Chairman of the House
Committee on Financial Services, said he remains
concerned that the oversight thresholds could
hinder lending activities, in particular multifamily
lending, which Frank sees as critical to meeting
the nation’s housing need. It is unclear
if Frank intends to make more of the issue next
year. The final rule is posted on NMHC’s
web site at.
CONGRESS
ADJOURNS, FINISHES TAX BILL,
LEAVES OTHER PRIORITIES INCOMPLETE
Tax Bill Passes. In one of
its final acts before adjourning for the year,
Congress passed a $45 billion catch-all package
of bills (H.R. 6111) addressing everything from
health care to oil drilling to extending several
expired or expiring tax incentives. The bill
includes several NMHC/NAA high-priority items
and one negative change in the law for the apartment
industry.
The bill extends and
expands a provision allowing the immediate expensing
of environmental cleanup costs. The provision,
which actually expired at the end of 2005, is
extended retroactively through 2007 and now
makes petroleum cleanup costs eligible for expensing.
In addition, as NMHC/NAA urged, Congress agreed
to a one-year extension of the energy efficiency
tax incentives enacted in 2005 for buildings.
The provision extends the deduction to property
placed in service prior to January 1, 2009.
NMHC/NAA had pushed for the extension to accommodate
larger, more comprehensive energy efficiency
upgrades that could not be completed in the
original two-year time frame allowed.
On the downside, however,
the package also includes a provision opposed
by NMHC/NAA to allow a limited deduction for
the cost of private mortgage insurance (PMI)
for certain taxpayers. In recent years, NMHC/NAA
have repeatedly blocked other attempts to pass
this new and unnecessary homeownership incentive.
Unfortunately, our earlier successes could not
withstand a last-minute rush by lawmakers to
turn a targeted non-controversial tax extender
bill into a massive tax bill filled with all
sorts of tax changes sought by special interest
groups. Republicans seized their last chance
to force their pet projects onto the "must
pass" bill before losing majority control
of Congress. Democrats, meanwhile, joined the
frenzy, racing to pass their favorite amendments
before new fiscal austerity rules go into effect
in the new Congress that will require new spending
programs or tax provisions to be "paid
for" with budget cuts elsewhere.
Despite this temporary
setback, NMHC/NAA believe the impact of the
PMI deduction will be very limited. In response
to concerns raised by NMHC/NAA, the measure
is only in effect for one year, and it only
applies to taxpayers with incomes up to $100,000
who itemize their tax deductions. As a practical
matter, many taxpayers in this income range
simply elect the standard deduction rather than
itemize, thus rendering the incentive moot.
The legislative struggle over the PMI incentive
will continue into the new Congress, since its
backers are expected to seek permanent status
for the provision. NMHC/NAA are already working
with key members of Congress to oppose such
an extension. In addition, the "pay-as-you-go"
rules expected in the next Congress will force
PMI proponents to develop a way to finance or
"pay" for any extension. Finally,
we expect the new Congress to have greater understanding
and appreciation of the importance of renters
and rental housing in the overall national housing
policy.
APPROPRIATIONS
BILLS
The 109th Congress
adjourned on December 9 without completing work
on 10 of the 13 FY 2007 appropriations bills,
including the HUD funding bill. Lawmakers passed
a third continuing resolution (CR) to keep the
government funded until February 15, but on
December 11, Democratic appropriators announced
that they will seek to pass a year-long CR when
they take over next year so they can focus instead
on the FY 2008 budget process. A CR for the
rest of the 2007 Fiscal Year will mean that
the funding of the Section 8 program will remain
essentially flat. It will give us more time
to work with the relevant congressional committees
to seek a higher level of funding and other
beneficial changes.
COUNTERFEIT
SPRINKLER NOTIFICATION
Apartment
firms should be aware of the latest in a number
of counterfeit sprinkler issues. The most
recent news concerns sprinkler heads designed
to resemble Globe Fire Sprinkler Corporation
sprinklers. The counterfeit heads have
“Globe” and the Underwriters Laboratories
(UL) mark on them. They are pendent-type
heads identified with a product model number
of GL 5651. The deflector is marked with:
SSP, cULus in a circle, GL 5651, 2005, 1550F/680C.
The only visible difference between the authentic
and counterfeit sprinklers is the screw head;
the counterfeit sprinklers have a slot-head
screw and the legitimate sprinklers have a hex-head
screw. UL is recommending that the counterfeit
sprinklers be replaced by qualified service
personnel and returned to the place of purchase.
2006/2007
CODE DEVELOPMENT HEARINGS
NMHC/NAA secured several
preliminary victories during the ICC’s
September hearings to consider changes to the
2009 IBC. If approved by the full
membership in May 2007, these changes would
allow apartment developers new flexibility in
how they design their individual units.
One change, for instance, increases the occupant
load for apartments from 10 to 24. That
proposal was approved after NMHC/NAA provided
data confirming that the size of an apartment
is not related to the building’s occupant
load; larger apartments simply have larger rooms
and more bedrooms, not more people. That
change will allow apartment units up to 4,000
square feet to have a single exit; current code
requires two exits for units greater than 2,000
square feet.
There were three sprinkler-related
changes that are beneficial to apartments.
One increases the dead-end corridor limit from
20 feet to 50 feet in buildings protected with
an NFPA 13 sprinkler system. Another would
increase the common travel distance inside of
the apartment unit from 50 feet to 125 feet
if the dwelling unit has an NFPA 13 or 13R sprinkler
system. A third would eliminate the requirement
that elevators be accessible from an area of
refuge or horizontal exit if the building is
protected with an NFPA 13 or 13R sprinkler system.
(Another approved change further clarified this
by stating that an area of refuge is not required
in apartment buildings.) These changes
were also supported by NMHC/NAA-provided data
on sprinkler performance. Specifically,
we demonstrated that apartments have a 96 percent
sprinkler activation performance reliability
compared to an overall 89 percent average for
all occupancies. New NFPA data covering
fire losses for the past 12 years support an
older Operation Life Safety report that there
have been no civilian or firefighter deaths
in buildings protected with an NFPA 13R sprinkler
system.
Other changes recommended for approval include:
(1) Section 509 Special Provision concerning
mixed occupancies to allow R (residential) occupancies
in the lower levels where the code now only
permits assembly with less than 300 occupants,
office or mercantile; (2) a revised definition
of “Level of Exit Discharge” to
clarify that it is the lowest story, not the
lowest horizontal plane at which an exit terminates;
and (3) only requiring handrails in dwelling
units when there are more than three risers
instead of the current code provision requiring
handrails when only one riser is present.
All of these victories are preliminary, however,
since they must still be approved by the full
membership next May.
Reprinted courtesy
of Apartment Age |